« XML and Electronic Forms | Main | Sarbanes-Oxley: Too Narrow? »
January 8, 2005
Taxonomies, Folksonomies & Controlled Vocabularies
There is an enlightening discussion going on between Lou Rosenfeld, Clay Shirky and others on the utility of folksonomies as used by Flickr and del.icio.us, vs. subject-matter-expert developed taxonomies. As one of the commenters has pointed out, this is not an "either/or" issue. Certain applications where the scope of the content and users is bounded will benefit from the discipline of a carefully architected vocabulary. Other applications where the scope of either the content or the user community is less well-defined will either suffer or, more likely, the users will ignore the prescriptions (this is why the "semantic web", if I understand it at all, is hopeless). The key issues are related: cost and adoption (cost is usually a function of adoption, not development), and I think they both would agree on this point. How these approaches might work together is trickier and well worth exploring. In any case, this debate provides a condensed lesson in many issues that most enterprise content managers have probably not thought through, but even those that have should check out this thread.
Share or tag this post on:
Digg | del.icio.us | Google | Yahoo My Web | Reddit | Newsvine
Posted by Frank Gilbane at January 8, 2005 7:57 AM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://gilbane.com/blog/mt-tb.cgi/9
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Taxonomies, Folksonomies & Controlled Vocabularies:
» More on userdriven classification (tagging) from UserDriven
"The advantage of folksonomies isn’t that they’re better than controlled vocabularies, it’s that they’re better than nothing, because controlled vocabularies are not extensible to the majority of cases where tagging is needed. Building, maintai... [Read More]
Tracked on January 8, 2005 2:18 PM
» Web 2.0: Bottom-up and Self-Organizing from Johnnie Manzari
When I was working on the first release of Photoshop Album, one of the biggest areas of contention was around tags. It was clear that there was a benefit to building an organizational model around tags, but it was unclear... [Read More]
Tracked on April 19, 2005 12:28 AM
» Doing CMS research and prefer not to reinvent the wheel? from bankrupt artist v.3
Saw a mention on CMS Wire today about The Gilbane Report releasing their findings in a new way; for free. They’ve been poking around CMS for the past 12 years and have been charging people to read their reports, but not any longer;
The Gilbane R... [Read More]
Tracked on May 26, 2006 1:22 PM
Comments
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)