Author: Frank Gilbane (Page 71 of 74)

Oracle, Context Media and the EII or ECI Market

August 3, 2005 / Frank Gilbane / 1 Comment

Although not officially announced, a number of trade publications have reported on Oracle’s acquisition of Content Media, and Tony Byrne succinctly captures what is of immediate interest to followers of the content management market.

What we started calling EII (Enterprise Information Integration) a few years ago, and what many vendors called ECI (Enterprise Content Integration) remains one of the biggest challenges organizations face – too big to be served by a small niche market, as evidenced by Oracle’s move, as well as by the earlier IBM and EMC acquisitions. For a more in-depth look at the problem, players and the market see our article on What is Enterprise Information Integration (EII)?

ECM Acquisition Week

June 23, 2005 / Frank Gilbane / 0 Comments

Lot’s of merger and acquisition news this week!

Hummingbird & RedDot
Trados & SDL
Infodata & McDonald Bradley
Stellent & e-Onehundred Group
and also a consortium merger: Compliance Consortium & OCEG.

Microsoft does the right thing with Office & XML

June 2, 2005 / Frank Gilbane / 0 Comments

Microsoft announced that XML will be the default file format for Office 12. I’ll look more at the details and what this means to OpenOffice etc. when I get a chance, but this is certainly great news and another major step forward for XML in general and Microsoft’s support for it. It looks like Microsoft has addressed (full Microsoft press release) the main concerns that critics exposed during the OpenOffice debate we have been covering here and in our conferences. Tim is impressed!
Update: Dan Farber has some additional info from Microsoft.
Update 2: Dan points to info from Rick Schaut on Office 12 Mac XML support.

OpenDocument an OASIS standard, but …

May 23, 2005 / Frank Gilbane / 1 Comment

It is excellent news that OASIS has approved OpenDocument as a standard. Hopefully it will also become an ISO standard. However, neither of these mean that it is necessarily the right approach for you. A single schema, no matter how well-designed, will not work for everyone. James Governor is quoted in the release: “One key to success will be the royalty free status of the spec; there are no financial penalties associated with developing to it.” Very true, but Microsoft’s schema is also royalty and cost free, and I believe they have committed (contractually even I think…?) e.g., to the EU, to keep it that way. See more on this here and here.

DITA Breakfast Seminar in Amsterdam

May 19, 2005 / Frank Gilbane / 1 Comment

A complimentary breakfast seminar and discussion:
“Technology Directions: Driving DITA Adoption in Europe”, has been added to next week’s conference in Amsterdam on Friday, May 27, 8 – 10:00 a.m. IBM, Idiom and Nokia will present on DITA and its practical applications, while leading an open discussion focused specifically on the adoption of DITA-based publishing initiatives in Europe through establishing regular meetings, networking opportunities and education events. Panelists from Thursday’s presentation will be on hand, with the addition of Indi Leipa, senior information architect, Nokia.

Reminders: Amsterdam & Boston Conferences

May 13, 2005 / Frank Gilbane / 0 Comments

Two quick reminders:

The Gilbane Content Management Conference in Amsterdam (co-located with XTech 2005) is only a week and a half away. See the conference program.
The call for papers deadline for Gilbane Boston is Monday May 16th. Proposal guidelines are here.

Enterprise blog, wiki and RSS Survey results

May 5, 2005 / Frank Gilbane / 2 Comments

We have published the results of our informal survey on enterprise use of blog, wiki and RSS technologies. We’ll keep the survey going for awhile and will update the results every so often. To date there are 58 respondents.
A few interesting tidbits:

Although most respondents are using one of the technologies, only half of them have official IT support.
knowledge management, internal information dissemination (portals!?), and project collaboration are all closely grouped as the leading applications.
Shockingly, only a third use RSS!
Almost a third are using one or more of these for content management. We’ll be sure to explore what this means in our upcoming Amsterdam keynote debate.

Future of Content Management debate in Amsterdam

April 24, 2005 / Frank Gilbane

Our opening keynote panel at our Amsterdam conference on 25 May, The Future of Content Management will be looking at strategic technology issues businesses, governments and NGOs need to be thinking about. Our panel is made up of technology executives who are responsible for a huge number of installed tools, and for strategic technology development at their respective firms. There will certainly be strong differences of opinion, but where this panel agrees on something, it will be worth knowing.

Some of the questions (with a few links to some of our views) we expect to ask the panel are:

There is a lot of debate about ECM (enterprise content management) suites vs. individual content applications. What is an “ECM suite”, and which approach makes the most sense, and why?
The proliferation of content applications and repositories has created a huge integration challenge. How will this get resolved? And when?
How will blog, wiki, and RSS technology affect content management applications?
Will taxonomies or “folksonomy” tagging technologies have a major impact on future CMS applications?
What is a content platform? Is it a repository? an index? a database, a file system? Does the concept of a content platform even even make sense? Will Longhorn’s WinFS change the game?
Are Portals dead for good? If so, what will take their place?
How will compliance requirements affect content technology, or digital/enterprise rights management products?
How will open source content management related software affect future content management implementations? How should it?
Are some open source software technologies more appropriate for enterprise content applications than others? If so, which ones and why?
Where in the software stack is the best place to provide basic content management functionality, e.g., management of content elements with attributes and metadata?
What percentage of enterprise content do you estimate is currently stored in XML? How do you see this changing in the next 12 -18 months? How will this affect technology development?
How will enterprise search and content management technology be integrated in the next 12 – 18 months?
What will be the most exciting content technology in the next 12 – 18 months?

If you have a question you would like to see us address, comment on this post, or send me an email.